The title of our film is ‘Nearly Reunited’. The film focuses on two people, Daniel (Daniel/Ben Brown) and Sophie (Sophie/Nicole Laurie), who are desperately in love with each other but through there own faults never manage to have a relationship. We decided to make our film belong to the Social Realism class.

We decided to make a social realism film as we felt it best fitted in with our ideas and made it easier for us to put our messages across. Social realism usually deals with hard hitting subjects such as crime, so we thought that this genre was perfectly set up for us to tackle a hard subject like love. Social realist films are regarded as one of the big hitters in the British film industry and many say they keep the British film industry alive.
“Better than any other genre, social realism has shown us to ourselves, pushing the boundaries in the effort to put the experiences of real Britons on the screen, and shaping our ideas of what British cinema can be. While our cinema has experienced all the fluctuations in fortune of Hollywood's first export territory, realism has been Britain's richest gift to world cinema.” http://www.screenonline.org.uk/film/id/1037898/index.html
Here is a list of websites I used when I was researching social realism…
filmstudies.suite101.com/article.../social_realism_in_british_film
blogs.warwick.ac.uk/michaelwalford/.../british_cinema_social/
www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O3-SocialRealism.html
How did your product use the conventions of social realism?
Overall I feel we stuck to the conventions of mise en scene closely and used them effectively. We managed to include….
Relevant settings to the time and location we where shooting.
Hidden messages and values that the audience have to uncover from looking at the body language of the characters.
Props that are consistent with popular culture (i.e. mobile phones, laptops, glamour magazines and iTunes)
However, I feel there where a few aspects of our film that didn’t conform well. For example, the lighting that we tried to keep as naturalistic as possible didn’t seem to work in certain scenes (i.e. Ben writing his letter and the split screen between Daniel and Sophie). Apart from this minor blip, I feel we did a pretty good job in sticking closely to the usual conventions.

How did our film follow camera work conventions?
In most social realist films, the camera work is fairly standard with an abundance of eye level medium shots. In our film we stuck closely to this and kept our choice of angles and frames simple. We felt that trying to make the camera work seem interesting and different would take away the fact that this was a social realist film. However, to vary it up a bit we threw in a split screen and filmed Ben as if he was looking in a mirror when he was getting changed. We felt this would keep the audience interested whilst also not forgetting the genre. The only thing that I think let us down in terms of the camera work was that we had too many long takes. This occurred because we where restricted to 5 minutes and needed to get a fair bit of information in, so our shots tended to be rushed and short.

How did our film conform to traditional editing conventions?
Standard editing in a social realism film is never amazing and dosent include loads of fades, dissolves or wipes, it is very much just simple straight forward cuts. During our editing process, we still wanted to keep the idea that this was more of a documentary than a film, so we kept the editing very simple and basic. However, we felt we needed to have a dissolve in the shot where the two people are growing up as it may not have been clear otherwise. As a whole the flow of our film is constant and this is due to the simple editing which doesn’t draw any attention away from the film.
Did our film conform to the sound conventions?
Just like in terms of the editing and camera work, the sound in social realist films is simple once again. The main sound you tend to get is always diegetic and adds to the atmosphere of the film. We knew that we needed to make our sound simple again to keep within the conventions of our genre. To do this we captured most of our diegetic sound on location with the video camera (apart from the birds tweeting). However, we used music to deliver our messages and get our points across. The whole idea for our film was to have the audience create there own interpretation about what is happening through the use of our music (non- diegetic sound).
What do social realism films try to say?
The main idea behind a social realism film is to give an audience of all different backgrounds a window to look into the lives of other people from different social classes. They also deal with hard hitting issues such as crime and youth culture. (For example Andrea Arnolds ‘Fish Tank’)
Representation in social realist films.
Social realist films represent people as normal people. They never have far fetched characters that are like a real life superman, they are normally working class people who struggle for money and have everyday problems to deal with. The characters always have something that people can relate to whether it be that they are struggling for money or that they are a single parent. The way these characters are represented is always in a way that makes them seem like a person you could see walking down the street.
Titles of social realist films
The title of these films seems to be of great importance to the overall marketing of the films. Firstly, the style of the titles (the way they look) is carried on not just on screen but with the film poster. Secondly, the meaning of the titles holds a key role in letting the audience know what the film is going to be about. For example, Andrea Arnold explained that the meaning of ‘Fish Tank’ is a reflection of how the main character, Mia, views her life. Our title gives a clear indication to our film as well. ‘Nearly Reunited’ gives off a sense of love, pain and disappointment, which is exactly what we where going for.
Narrative of our film
All films follow a basic set of rules for narrative, devised by Todorov. They consist of 3 simple steps….

1. Equilibrium
2. Dis-equilibrium
3. Re-equilibrium
Our film follows these steps closely in order to give it a balanced feel.
How effective is the combination of your main product and your ancillary task?


I think that both the poster and the review for our film are very good. Firstly, the review not only looks like a very high standard review for the magazine ‘Little White Lie’s’ but it also has an extremely high standard of vocabulary used. Nicole and Dani put a lot of work into the language and text in the review and me and Ben put a lot of work into the layout using in-design. Secondly, the poster was perhaps the hardest one to create and finally decide on an idea that we liked and was acceptable to the standards that we needed. We all created draft ideas for our film poster but in the end we decided to use Dani’s as we felt it was simple yet gave all the information the audience needed.
Although my poster wasn’t used, I feel it was a decent idea because mainly it shows the distance between the two main characters. As well as that, it gives a clear indication of the emotion they are feeling due to the expression on there faces. What the audience can gain from this is that the two characters are either in love and can’t do anything about it or that there is something dividing the two.
What attracts our target audience to our poster? :
The target audience for our film was women aged 18-25. We felt this poster would be appealing to them because…
- The colours we used are neutral.
- We had a quote from glamour magazine, which is a woman’s lifestyle favourite.
As well as these points, Dani worked out that the poster we made has a lot of similarities to that of the film ‘Remember Me’, a film of the same genre as ours. The colour scheme, positioning of the characters, the style of the title and the placement of the actors names are all similar to ours.

What have you learnt from your audience feedback?
We felt the best way to gather feedback for our film was to use the social networking site ‘Facebook’. We decided this was the best method because hundreds of our friends, mostly of our target audience, use the site, so we could send them the link and then they could post there comments online for us to see.

The response we had from everyone was phenomenal and proved very useful when it came to talking about our strengths and weaknesses. Here is a list of what they said…
Positive:
Very good story line
Very good music
Good match on action
The fade showing them growing up was very good
Excellent shots of Ben getting changed in front of mirror
Brilliant quick cuts in the first scene where they are both listening to the same music
Nice idea using the same music at the end as a reminder to them both
The radio broadcast was brilliant and very funny
Negative
Some shots where too dark
The audience wasn’t given enough time to read the letter
Could have used a few more shots
There is a lot more positive feedback than negative. I feel our strongest points in this film where the use of sound, the editing techniques and effects we used. The shots people enjoyed the most where…
The fade


Shots of Ben


The negative feedback gave us an insight into what went wrong. Although to be honest upon watching our completed version, before we got any feedback, we knew that some of these shots where not very good at all. One of the major problems that occurred to us was the use of lighting. Because we wanted to keep the feel of a social realist film, we decided to use natural lighting but that turned out to be harder than we thought as some of the shots inside where to dark to register with the camera.

The comments about us not using varied shots and angles was not a welcome one. We felt the whole point of a social realist film was to make it seem simple so it is as if you are standing with the person watching what is going on. Had we put different angles and shot types in, I feel we would have lost our genre of social realism.
How did you use new media technologies in the construction and research, planning and evaluation stages?
Since last year I feel that we have learnt a great deal more about the technology that is at hand to us. There wasn’t that many new pieces of hardware for us to use, but the standard of filming and our knowledge of camera angles and shots improved greatly from our first project last year. Simple mistakes that where being made last year like not setting the white balance before a shot and not having a steady shot whilst using a tripod where all done away with this year.
My main task was to help everyone in different ways. One lesson I would be helping Ben with the editing, using Final Cut Pro, and then the next I would be helping Dani with the sound, using GarageBand and also a field recorder.
Final Cut Pro is a piece of editing software on the Apple Mac’s which we where encouraged to use this year. We began our editing process using iMovie, but we where told to switch to Final Cut as it had a much more advanced set up and more options in terms of effects. I personally found Final Cut Pro quite hard to use, so when I did help Ben with the editing I would sit with him and tell him my ideas whilst he put them into practice. Using Final Cut Pro, we managed to create the scene where the two characters grow up and also the split screen shot of the two younger characters.
GarageBand is another piece of editing software on the Mac’s, only this time it’s primary use is for sound. From our projects last year, I found GarageBand very easy to use. We used GarageBand to edit the sound of our film. For example, the music in the second half of the film was all created from different samples of sounds that you can find on GarageBand.
As well as GarageBand, we also had field recorders to capture our own sounds. We took advantage of this and decided to record our own track for the first half of the film. Me and Ben took a recorder and set it up and played the song that we wanted to have at the beginning of the film. Afterwards we uploaded the track to GarageBand and imported it into our film, after editing it to the right pitch and length we wanted.
In order to keep track of our progress, we had to constantly update our blogs. This was not a new piece of technology but it did provide us with a chance to work on a blog again from last year and do things differently. This time around the language I used on the blog was more of a traditional blog style (i.e. relatively informal) whereas last year I wrote everything as if it was an essay.
What we used (summary)
GarageBand
Final Cut Pro
Blog
Digital Camera
My role overall
My main task in making this film changed as we progressed through the production process. Firstly I was in charge of thinking up ideas for our film through research into the genre we chose to do. After I gained a few good ideas we adapted one of them to come up with the final idea for our film. Once we began filming, I was given the task of doing most of the camerawork, although I did share a lot of the work with Dani. During the filming process I would set the camera up, tell the actors what scene we where doing next, set the camera up accordingly and then shoot the scene. Finally, in the latter stages of the project, my main role was to help everyone. I would help Ben with the editing if he needed it and I was also able to help Dani and Nicole with the review. I feel I could have been doing a lot more than I did at this stage, but the group decided that they didn’t need that much help so my role was very minimal.



















































































